Hi
sorry to bother you all only just seen this site
I am an egyptologist writing a paper on Ankhesenamun and would be really interested to hear from anyone who believes they are re-incarnated from her. I know this may sound less than scholarly and my work is drawn from actual evidence but I am open minded and thought this might be a good time to see if anyone can give me a fresh angle to start from. I promise I will treat anything you say with respect and hopefully you can post something that might give me a fresh look at the evidence
thanks

Looking for me? Lol! . But are you sure you want help from a source like that? If you're writing a serious or formal paper then you shouldn't consider this as a factual source. Still, if you want my input (yes, I do believe I was Ankhesenamun in a past life, hence the name, see? ), what kinds of things do you want to know, and what exactly is you're paper about (and I mean like thesis statement)?

Here is my bare bones theory on Queen Ankhesenamun's fate.
First of all, horemheb was the mastermind behind tut's death. he obviously had the king's trust and had the oppurtunity to be alone with tut to carry out the murder. my theory is that aya was a pawn in horemheb's master plan. aya and horemheb planned the murder together. aya was too close and too old to kill tut himself so he had horemheb carry out the task. it would behoove horemheb to do this so he could remain the leader of the military. my theory is that Queen Ankhesenamun was urging tut to take control of his dynasty and to stop being a puppet for aya. this of course he would do eventually and maybe did try and this resulted in his death. aya took the throne and forced Queen Ankhesenamun to marry him and give him an heir. horemheb couldn't let that happen because he wanted that throne. he knew that his only way total power was to let aya take the throne since he would die soon anyway and then he would inherit the throne. Queen Ankhesenamun must have gotten pregnant from the rape of aya and either killed herself or was killed by horemheb to prevent her rightful heir from taking the throne and stealing any chance of horemheb becoming pharoah. in my opinion, she was poisoned by horemheb and it was made to look like a suicide so that no one would be suspicious of horemheb's dastardly deeds. that's my theory.

Though, you do know about that recent CT scan showed that King Tut was NOT murdered right....? Kinda pokes a hole in your theory doesn't it.

no, in fact, it does not. thanks for the kind words though.
there is much that is not known for sure and i am sure you are aware that this whole situation has evolved many times since 1922. if you look at the big picture and think outside of the box, you might gain a little insight into the situation. or not, that's up to you.

We KNOW that Ankhsenpaaton was married to Tutankhaton.
We KNOW that Tutankhaton changed his name, along with the queen changing hers, to reflect the old god.
We KNOW that Tutankkhamen died at an early age.
We KNOW that the royal couple had no children that lived.
We KNOW that Aye became Pharaoh after Tutankhamen.
Anything more is pure speculation. It's all very romantic and thrilling guess-work. Do you have ANY proof, aka, of any of your theories? If so, I would like to read them. So far, everything you have posted is, as you say, fodder for an historical novel.

Thanks for the question.... I was wondering how they might have addressed this issue.

Deb

I didn't realize I was stating the obvious with indignation, aka. Please feel free to post anything you think we might be interested. Personally, I do not think that "fixed thinking and the need to be right" was in my post at all. And to suggest that such thinking was the reason Egypt lost power and prestige in the world was because of such thinking borders on New Age philosophy and nothing more. Feel free to have any theory you THINK may be correct--but do not impose it on all of us. Thinking along the line of others does not make puppets with no ideas of our own, but 99.9% of the Egyptophiles.

you have proven my point once again. i will be happy to leave you with your posting and go my way. re-read your post with an objective viewpoint and you might see how you are sounding to another person. I didn't come on this board to fight, i simply came here to share my opinion. I never imposed my thinking on anyone, the fact that you think i did shows how egocentric your thinking is, which is precisely the reason that you see nothing indignant about your post.
As far as New Age Philosophy- why don't you show me another reason that humanity has suffered since the beginning of time if it isn't EGO. You may call that New Age. I call it eternal truth, it doesn't change, it will never change, regardless of what you or anyone else chooses to label it.

Thank you for sharing these Eternal Truth toughts of yours...good-bye